It’s a camera filming something the camera taking the picture can’t see and in the background there is a bunch of kids talking in a classroom
When you're arguing you want to make your point as objective as possible, for this you have to be impartial so that your proof is strong.
Comparing the opposite side's views to something unpleasant is useless since this kind of comparison holds no proof that your argument is true. <em>Incorrect</em>
If you include only general details the audience will understand, you might not be able to communicate the specific points of your argument, therefore you wouldn't be able to prove it is accurate. <em>Incorrect</em>
To make your argument effective you have to use specific details to refute the opposite side's views. That way you'll present the specific points in which your argument will stand, you will communicate logical and objective ideas about your argument and they will work to prove it. <u><em>Correct</em></u>
If you appeal to emotion, your argument will be subject to possible biases since the way a person or group feels towards something doesn't prove it right or wrong. <em>Incorrect</em>
Answer and Explanation:
Sofocles decided that the catastrophe involving Oedipus and Jocasta should take place offstage and that these facts be presented by a servant. This decision was made to allow the narrative to increase dramatically, without being appealing and stimulating the public's imagination.
This is because when the servant is placed as the bearer of the catastrophe information, the public can use his words and create his own image of what happened and may even doubt that the facts narrated are real. Sofocle, then, gave the public autonomy over the tragic end of the story.
Answer:
The question violates the requirement of clarity or unambiguity.
Explanation:
The science of designing appropriate questions comes up when one is in designing a questionnaire for surveys.
The guidelines for writing questions are given below:
- Questions must always be designed with the objective of the research in mind;
- They must be concise, direct to the point and easy to understand. In other words, they must be unambiguous.
- They must be designed to elicit objective answers, not emotional responses. Emotional responses may not come from a lucid mind.
- Questions must follow each other sequentially and logically.
- If the questions are closed-ended, they must contain options from which the respondents can select
- Whether closed-ended or not, the researcher must as much as possible put themselves in the shoes of the respondents such that any inhibitions from properly or correctly answer the questions are removed.
Cheers!
I know exactly how you feel...I don’t even see a point in anything right now. I hope things get easier. And feel free to talk to me I don’t mind at all❤️.
