Technology during World War I (1914-1918) reflected a trend toward industrialism and the application of mass-productionmethods to weapons and to the technology of warfare in general. This trend began at least fifty years prior to World War Iduring the American Civil War of 1861-1865,[1] and continued through many smaller conflicts in which soldiers and strategists tested new weapons.
One could characterize the earlier years of the First World War as a clash of 20th-century technology with 19th-century warfare in the form of ineffective battles with huge numbers of casualties on both sides. On land, only in the final year of the war did the major armies made effective steps in revolutionizing matters of command and control and tactics to adapt to the modern battlefield and start to harness the myriad new technologies to effective military purposes. Tactical reorganizations (such as shifting the focus of command from the 100+ man company to the 10+ man squad) went hand-in-hand with armored cars, the first submachine guns, and automatic rifles that a single individual soldier could carry and use.
Answer:
Under the State Constitution, every bill must be read three times before it may be passed. The courts have held, however, that this requirement can be satisfied by reading the bill's title. Upon introduction, the bill's title is read a first and second time in the Senate and is read once in the House.
Explanation:
Answer:
Supreme Court of United States
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment in the Constitution is one of the important amendment done in the Constitution of United Sates.
The 14th amendment of the constitution was ratified in the year 1868. It is important court case of the Supreme court that granted citizenship to all the people born in the United States or naturalized in the U.S.
The Due process of law states that all persons who were born or naturalized in the U.S. and are subjected to the jurisdiction are declared the citizens of the United States of America.
The Supreme Court said that no state has any right to deprive any person's life, property or one's liberty.
<u>Answer:</u>
While the facts used to demonstrate that the cotton gin decreased the work of expelling seeds, it did not diminish the requirement for captives to develop and pick the cotton. The inverse happened. Cotton, becoming turned out to be so gainful for the growth that it significantly expanded their interest for both land and slave work.
Cotton was a mechanical advancement that prompted an expanded interest for slaves in the America during the early-mid 1800s. There it made it simpler to separate seeds from the cotton - making it quicker to pick cotton
