Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.
You have to go to Florida beach
Answer:
dude okay are you fr cuz i feel bad i wanna help
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Put less work in, get more work out
Explanation:
Efficiency means that you want to maximize something with putting little in. With this, the only answer that would make sense would be B.
If you were to put more work in and get less work out that would not be efficient at all. It would be the complete opposite.
If you were to put less work in and get less work out that is still inefficient.
If you put more work in and get more work out that could appear as efficient, but you are still putting in a lot of work which is not efficient.
Thus the best answer would be B. Put less work in, get more work out.
Hope this helps!! Ask questions if you need!
