Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
this is actually like six but its cool right?
Develop fishery management plans.
Convene committees and advisory panels and conduct public meetings.
Develop research priorities.
Select fishery management options.
Set annual catch limits based on best available science.
Develop and implement rebuilding plans.
A person with <u>irritable bowel syndrome</u> typically experiences an excessive colonic response to meals, gastrointestinal hormones, and stress.
Irritable bowel syndrome refers to a common disorder which affects the large intestine. The main causes of this type of syndrome can be a combination of problems. Functional gastrointestinal disorders like the irritable bowel syndrome are actually problems with brain-gut reaction, that is, how your brain and gut work together.
The various signs and symptoms of this problem can be cramping, bloating, gas, abdominal pain, diarrhea or constipation or even both of them. This irritable bowel syndrome is a chronic disease which one has to manage long-term.
To learn more about irritable bowel syndrome, click
brainly.com/question/14888583
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>less accepting of the idea that humans are rational animals
He believes that human are animals that completely have to restraint themselves from irrational/animalistic instinct.
He doesn't buy the notion that humans are inherently good like what being preached by religious establishments, which make him regarded as the enemy of the church at that time</span>
Answer:
The Himalayan mountain range and Tibetan plateau have formed as a result of the collision between the Indian Plate and Eurasian Plate which began 50 million years ago and continues today. Explanation: hoped i helped
