Answer:
The Second Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia in the summer of 1775, shortly after the war with the British had begun. It was preceded by the First Continental Congress in the fall of 1774.
Explanation:
I hope this helps! Good Luck! ;)
Answer:
Only Congress has that power.
Explanation:
The question is not complete, here is the complete question followed by the answer;
Aristotle came up with many reasons why statesmen should know all the different types of government. Which of the following is
not
one of Aristotle's reasons?
And the answer is "so that the statesmen can select the government that would maximize their personal power".
Aristotle on statesman that a few people imagine that the capabilities of a statesman, ruler, householder, and master are the same, and that they vary, not in kind, but rather just in the quantity of their subjects. At the point when the legislature is close to home, the ruler is a king; while, as indicated by the standards of the political science, the natives manage and are controlled thus, at that point he is known as a statesman.
The Patriot is a 2000 war film directed by Roland Emmerich, written by Robert Rodat, and starring Mel Gibson, Chris Cooper, and Heath Ledger. Education in the southern colonies is portrayed as very backwards, showing inhabitants to be extremely supportive of King George and against war with Great Britain.<span>
Hope this helps!</span>
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
