1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verdich [7]
3 years ago
5

What were United Nations inspectors looking for in Iraq prior to the Iraqi War?

History
2 answers:
daser333 [38]3 years ago
5 0

The main purpose of the United Nations inspectors in Iraq before the  Gulf War was to look for weapons of mass destruction, which Iraq was thought to have hidden. Also, Iraq had a history of using chemical weapons even against its own people, for these reasons, the United Nations Imposed as a condition to end hostilities in the region, that the country disclosed all the weapons of mass destruction it had in its arsenal.

Resolution 687 was passed by the Security Council which demanded the removal and destruction of Chemical, Biological and Nuclear arms.  Even though  at first Iraq agreed to cooperate with the inspectors, later they became more evasive and tried to deceive the United Nations´ inspectors.

In terms, the United Nations had no other option but to authorized the use of force against Iraq to make them comply.  

 

fgiga [73]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

weapons of mass destruction

You might be interested in
Why were trade routes important to the growth of the Kingdom of Ghana?​
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer:

The trade route were very important to the Ghana empire because the Ghana Empire became rich and wealthy as a result of increased trans-Saharan trade. This trade involved mostly goods such as gold and salt.

It allowed for urbanization and also permitted territorial expansion to gain control over the different trade routes.

4 0
3 years ago
Match each word with the phrase that best defines it.
faltersainse [42]

I am here to give the brainiest answer not to get points

Answer: yes

6 0
3 years ago
Should the U.S. have entered the war officially before the Pearl Harbor attack?<br> Why or why not.
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

At the most extreme, no attack on Pearl Harbor could have meant no US entering the war, no ships of soldiers pouring over the Atlantic, and no D-Day, all putting 'victory in Europe' in doubt

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How were the Spain able to conquer the Aztec and Inca Empires
Anastaziya [24]

https://www.ducksters.com/history/aztec_empire/spanish_conquest.php

might be able to answer your quesrtion

3 0
3 years ago
Which group of people Jackson addressing
IrinaVladis [17]
I would like to answer, but not enough info..
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Collective a0 provides organized workers a way to negotiate with their employers for better wages, hours, conditions, and benefi
    7·2 answers
  • Why did american leaders believed it was important to keep the philippines?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the north achieve victory in the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • It was difficult to be a scribe in ancient Egypt because the Egyptians hardly ever wrote anything down and finding a job was dif
    13·1 answer
  • Why are parts of the northeastern united states known as the rust belt?
    15·2 answers
  • In ancient Ghana, the next king would be the son of the current king’s sister. Which of the following words describes this syste
    12·2 answers
  • Members of the third estate wanted to end france’s
    12·1 answer
  • Explain why puritanism appealed to many people living during the early modern european period
    15·2 answers
  • World War II resulted in increased attention to which of these by the Roosevelt administration?
    10·1 answer
  • How does the cartoon above show one of the problems with majority rule?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!