1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slavikrds [6]
2 years ago
14

Should the U.S. have entered the war officially before the Pearl Harbor attack? Why or why not.

History
1 answer:
11111nata11111 [884]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

At the most extreme, no attack on Pearl Harbor could have meant no US entering the war, no ships of soldiers pouring over the Atlantic, and no D-Day, all putting 'victory in Europe' in doubt

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did china not become highly industrialized?
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

Ineffective rulers, corrupt officials, and a government without money, higher taxes and bad harvests.

4 0
3 years ago
In Plessy v. Ferguson homer Plessy claim that separate but equal violated his rights under the ?
Amanda [17]
The 14th amendment is the answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did a local conflict between austria-hugary and serbia result in a global war?​
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

In short, the conflict stemmed merely from Austria-Hungary and Serbia’s disagreement over how to handle the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand: the Austro-Hungarian government believed that the Serbian government was connected with the assassination and therefore demanded to be involved in the investigation and judicial process within Serbia.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are all 27 amendments of the constitution?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

2nd AmendmentRight to Bear Arms3rd AmendmentNo quartering of soldiers4th AmendmentProtection against illegal search and seizure5th AmendmentProtection against self-incrimination, double jeopardy. Protection of due process and right to a grand jury.6th AmendmentRight to speedy and public trial, impartial jury and right to counsel.7th AmendmentRight to a trial by jury in common-law cases.8th AmendmentProtection against cruel and unusual punishment. No excessive bail imposed.9th AmendmentThe enumeration of rights in the Constitution won't be used against the people.10th AmendmentReserved powers to the states.11th AmendmentStates are protected from being sued by citizens of another state.12th AmendmentSeparated balloting procedures for president and vice-president (put them as a team).13th AmendmentAbolition of slavery.14th AmendmentGranted former slaves citizenship and equal protection, established principle of selective incorporation.15th AmendmentAfrican-American men could vote.16th AmendmentEstablished federal income tax.17th AmendmentDirect election of U.S. Senators.18th AmendmentProhibition.19th AmendmentWomen have the right to vote.20th AmendmentPresident and vice-president's term of office begins on January 20th, and no longer in March.21st AmendmentRepeal of Prohibition22nd AmendmentPresidents limited to 2 terms.23rd AmendmentD.C. given presidential electors.24th AmendentPoll tax is illegal.25th AmendmentEstablished VP as successor if P is unable to serve. P can nominate a VP if there is a VP vacancy.26th Amendment18-year-olds have the right to vote.27th AmendmentCongressional pay raises will only take effect after the next election

Explanation:

Therefore, this shows why the 27 amendments matter but here you go

7 0
3 years ago
4.16: A New Century Unit Test
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

c. They wanted immigrants barred from the United States.

Explanation:

Nativism refers to a political position that privileges the welfare and the interests of the people who have been born in certain place (the natives) over immigrants. As more and more immigrants moved to the United States in the late 19th century,<u> the nativist movement gained strength, and they wanted immigrants barred from the United States</u>, especially those coming from China, Italy, and Eastern Europe. The nativists scored some successes, especially with the passing of the Emergency Quota Act of 1921, which placed restrictions on how many immigrants could enter the United States. This Act was further expanded by the Immigration Act of 1924, which banned immigrants from Asia and set strict limits on immigrants from other parts of the world, especially Eastern Europe. This discriminatory policy stayed in force until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Andrew Carnegie would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
    12·2 answers
  • Was South Carolina justified in seceding?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the primary way that the economy in the South differed from the economy of the North?
    9·1 answer
  • The ottoman empire(turks) massacred over a million armenians because they were worried the armenians were sympathetic to which c
    11·1 answer
  • In what ways was racism common in both the north and the south?
    6·1 answer
  • Pleas Answer
    7·2 answers
  • Josiah strong and Albert beveridge agreed that expansionism was a natural part of American destiny. How did Strongs argument dif
    14·1 answer
  • What caused WW1 make a claim on what the most important factor was in the start of the war
    15·1 answer
  • Match the vocabulary word with its meaning. 1.Bolshevik a member of the left-wing majority group of the Russian Social Democrati
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Navajo Code Talkers (Native
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!