1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veseljchak [2.6K]
3 years ago
15

Explain the term popular sovereignty

History
1 answer:
EleoNora [17]3 years ago
8 0
Popular sovereignty is when the government is ruled by the people, and they sustain the government by electing <span> representatives to give them political power.</span> 
You might be interested in
Which had the greatest effect on the growth of cities and the expansion of cities to suburbs
Monica [59]
I believe the answer is Transportation Innovations
7 0
3 years ago
What aided scientists in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphics during the 19th century?
sergij07 [2.7K]
The most significant clue that helped was the Rosetta Stone, an inscription in three scripts.
5 0
3 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
Events and trends on the local, national, and global sphere are interrelated as seen through ______.
grandymaker [24]

Events and trends in the local, national and global spheres are interconnected and very interconnected. The local scale of events and trends interconnected makes a national scale, again associated with events and trends on the national scale, making it together, global. The global scale with its trends creates a full circle and affects local. Thus, the circle is closed through economic interests ie economic connections.

The answer is: A.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Johnson, which of the following was the primary reason for the tribes to unite
Tanzania [10]

I would personally go with letter C

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST<br><br> How did Dracos contribution change the government?
    6·1 answer
  • MANY POINTS 50PTS
    6·2 answers
  • This event forced the United Stated to enter World War 1 (WWI)?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is Mustafa Kemal Ataturk important to the history of Turkey? (extra points)
    13·1 answer
  • led to a new york based band in the early 1920's which is talked about being one of important influences on the popular swing er
    10·1 answer
  • For how long do we elect the president
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes the sequence of events in Hitler's campaign against the Jews of Germany?
    11·1 answer
  • What event precipitated the English Civil War?
    13·2 answers
  • Cash crop <br><br> Afghanistan a little detail about it right now
    6·1 answer
  • Plz hurry plz
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!