<span>a. the shortest possible time to complete an activity.
Crash Time is the shortest possible time it takes to complete a job or activity by expediting everything associated with the job or activity. It's a good example of the time/money trade off in that you can frequently decrease the time something takes by spending more money. So let's look at the choices and see why they're right or wrong.
a. The shortest possible time to complete an activity.
* This pretty much is the same as the definition, so it's the correct choice.
b. The time necessary to complete an activity under abnormal conditions.
* This answer raises the question "What's an abnormal condition?" Does everything go right and things go faster? Does everything go wrong and it's gonna take a long time? In my experience both extremes are "abnormal". So this is a wrong choice.
c. The difference between earliest start time and earliest finish time.
* This answer is lacking the idea of a job or task. Earliest start time of what? So it's a wrong choice.
d. The activity time associated with any management intervention.
* So a phone call from management would be crash time? The boss walking past to see how things are doing? This is a very open ended and ambiguous answer. So it's wrong.</span>
Answer:
r = 9.14%
Explanation:
Simple interest = P * (1+rt)
Simple interest = $10,000 * (1+0.10 * 3)
Simple interest = $10,000 * 1.3
Simple interest = $13,000
Calculating the compound interest rate
A = P*(1+r)^n
$13,000 = $10,000 * (1+r)^3
(1+r)^3 = $13,000 / $10,000
r = ![\sqrt[3]{$13,000/ $10,000 - 1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%2413%2C000%2F%20%2410%2C000%20%20-%201%7D)
r = 0.0914
r = 9.14%
Answer:
He may still be covered in some cases.
He faces more risk than insured people do.
He may have to take precautions but many factors are beyond his control.
Not being able to afford insurance was a factor in him not being covered.
Explanation:
I got it correct
Answer:
$748,820
Explanation:
The computation of the incremental cash flow is shown below:
As we know that
Incremental cash flow = Sale price - (sale price - book value) × tax rate
where,
Sale price is $791,000
The book value is
= Purchase value - accumulated depreciation
= $1,190,000 - $1,190,000 ÷ 7 years × 3 years
= $1,190,000 - $510,000
= $680,000
So, the incremental cash flow is
= $791,000 - ($791,000 - $680,000) × 38%
= $791,000 - $42,180
= $748,820
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Temporal orientation.
Explanation:
Holland psychologist Geert Hofstede (1928-2020) proposed there are five dimensions of culture among societies. Those are: <em>Power Distance Index, Individualism Versus Collectivism, Masculinity versus Femininity, Uncertainty Avoidance Index, </em>and<em> Long- Versus Short-Term Orientation.
</em>
Long- Versus Short-Term Orientation <em>or </em>Temporal Orientation <em>represents the time horizon individuals of a given society display. Long-term oriented countries are pragmatic, modest and emphasize virtues. Therefore, the Japanese company of the case would be displaying this type of culture by prioritizing objectives for over twenty years rather than two years.</em>