Answer:
Perfect Tender Rule
A. True
Explanation:
The Uniform Commercial Code's Article 2 recognizes the legal right of a buyer of goods to demand precise conformity of the goods to the product description in quality, quantity, and delivery manner. Therefore, the buyer may reject goods offered by the seller which do not conform to the earlier product descriptions. This rule is called the Perfect Tender Rule. An exception to this rule will be if the seller has a reason to believe that non-conforming goods will be acceptable to the buyer.
Answer:
B. $600,000
Explanation:
The computation of the interest expense on the bond for the year 2012 is shown below:
= Interest expense as on 30 June 2012 + interest expense as on December 31 2012
= $300,000 + $300,000
= $600,000
For computing the interest expense for the year 2012, we added the interest expense of June 30 and for December 31 of 2012 only so that the correct amount could come
Answer:
Effect on income= $15,000 increase
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A business received an offer from an exporter for 10,000 units for $13.50 per unit.
Unit manufacturing costs:
Variable 12
<u>Because it is a special offer and there is unused capacity, we will not take into account the fixed costs.</u>
Effect on income= number of units*unitary contribution margin
Effect on income= 10,000*(13.5 - 12)
Effect on income= $15,000 increase
Answer:
$12,500
Explanation:
Calculation for the total amount removed from Joshua’s estate in 2017
Since we were told that In 2016, Joshua gave the amount of $12,500 to his son in which in the same year which was 2017, the XYZ shares are worth the amount of $25,000 which means that the total amount removed from Joshua’s estate in 2017 will be $12,500 ($25,000-$12,500).
Answer:
The true statement about the Siemens bribery scandal is:
b The CEO was involved and condoned it.
Explanation:
The 2008 Siemens scandal was an organized and deliberate effort by the company to bribe government officials in order to secure supply contracts from national governments. It was a worldwide act perpetrated by senior management officials with a long-term pattern. The massive bribery attracted a fine of $160 billion. It seems that bribery is an "embedded business culture in the company."
