1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EleoNora [17]
3 years ago
15

How does the author contrast the differing points of view of Rainsford and Whitney?

English
2 answers:
Naya [18.7K]3 years ago
8 0
I think that the answer is D
Tresset [83]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Letter D is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The question refers to The Most Dangerous Game, a short story written by American author Richard Connell. The story narrates how a hunter falls from a ship and swims to an island in the Caribbean where a Russian aristocrat hunts him.

Due to different characterizations and descriptions of the characters, it is possible to deduct that Rainsford is indifferent to the feelings of those who are hunted, while Whitney can at least consider what it is like to be hunted instead of being the hunter. Due to this, letter D is the correct answer.

You might be interested in
Why would pizza not be considered an art form? (16 pts reward)
UNO [17]
You have to understand that they are the home of made pizza and a place were they an be home made.
8 0
3 years ago
Can you please write a simple 3 lined haiku? I really need help!!
finlep [7]
Warm day
Ravens eating corn dogs in
The back of a truck
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hey yall I had to write a myth in English I was wondering if you guys would read it and tell me your thoughts thank you so much
sukhopar [10]

I really love the idea of your myth and I feel like you get the point across really well.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When appraising a situation in which you are late for school, what would you consider before deciding how stressed you feel abou
slamgirl [31]

Answer:

Richard Lazarus

You probably picture most psychologists as being calm and rational individuals, right? Well, not exactly. In fact, in the 1960s, there was a heated war going on between two camps of psychology: the behaviorists and the cognitive psychologists.

Behavioral psychology approached emotions and thoughts as window dressing and maintained the belief that the major driving force within people is their responses to rewards and punishments from the world around them. For example, if you give someone a chocolate cookie every time they go running, they'll want to go running more because they will associate it with the reward of chocolate chip cookies. Never mind that they won't lose weight that way!

On the other hand, cognitive psychology focused on the importance of thoughts and emotions in the way that a person lives from day to day. For example, if someone is trying to lose weight, cognitive psychologists believe he needs to change the way he thinks about food and exercise, learning to appreciate healthy foods and learning to think positively about exercising.

In the middle of the 20th century, behaviorists ruled the field of psychology. Thoughts? Feelings? Most psychologists didn't put much stock in those!

But Richard Lazarus stood up for thoughts and feelings. He studied people's stress levels and said that events are not good or bad, but the way we think about them is positive or negative, and therefore has an impact on our stress levels. For example, say that you are late to work and the person in line in front of you at the coffee shop is taking forever to order what he wants.

The fact that the person is taking that long isn't good or bad by itself. But you believe that it's a negative experience because it's going to make you late to work, which makes you feel stressed out.

On the other hand, you could look at that situation and say to yourself, 'So what if I'm late? This is actually good because it's giving me a few extra minutes this morning to catch my breath before going into the office.' You think of it as a positive experience, and therefore you don't feel stressed out.

Lazarus's theory is called the appraisal theory of stress, or the transactional theory of stress. You can remember this because the way a person appraises the situation affects how they feel about it. According to this theory, there are two things that a person thinks when they are faced with a situation. These are called the primary appraisal and the secondary appraisal.

3 0
3 years ago
(Can someone help me with essay its about how to kill a mockingbird)
maksim [4K]

Answer:

In To Kill a Mockingbird, children live in an inventive world where mysteries abound but little exists to actually cause them harm. Scout and Jem spend much of their time inventing stories about their reclusive neighbor Boo Radley, gleefully scaring themselves before rushing to the secure, calming presence of their father, Atticus. As the novel progresses, however, the imaginary threat that Boo Radley poses pales in comparison to the real dangers Jem and Scout encounter in the adult world. The siblings’ recognition of the difference between the two pushes them out of childhood and toward maturity—and as they make that transition, Boo Radley, their childhood bogeyman, helps serve as link between their past and their present. The games and stories Jem and Scout create around Boo Radley depict him as a source of violence and danger. However, though these inventions seem designed to prove the children’s braveness and maturity, they paradoxically prove that Jem, Scout, and their friend Dill fundamentally remain children. Their stories are gruesome, and the thrill of their games—such as touching the side of Boo’s house—comes from the danger they imagine they would face if Boo were to catch them. However, the children are able to indulge in wild imaginings and take what they perceive as risky chances only because they feel completely safe in the care of Atticus, who protects them from a dark, dangerous world. The threatening, menacing Boo thus remains firmly entrenched in their childhood worldview, where adults are infallible and all-powerful. When adult protection breaks down in the novel, Jem and Scout get their first taste of true danger, which is different from the imagined dangers they’d attributed to Boo Radley. The fire at Miss Maudie’s, Mrs. Dubose’s grisly death, and the violence and unrest that trails in the wake of the Tom Robinson case introduce real misfortune and anxiety into their lives. For the first time, adults are frightened and sad along with the children, and therefore cannot be counted on to provide security or refuge. Boo Radley, once such a threatening presence, now seems like a remnant of a more innocent time. The contrast between then and now seems all the more stark because Boo Radley remains in their lives, a constant reminder of how things had been before. Faced with real dangers, Jem and Scout must tap into new levels of maturity in order to deal with tragedy, new social challenges, and increased familial expectations. As their relationship with Atticus and the larger adult community changes, their relationship with Boo changes as well. Once just a creepy, mostly abstract figure, Boo begins playing a more active role in the children’s lives, first by protecting Scout with a blanket during Miss Maudie’s fire and then by protecting Jem and Scout from an attack by Bob Ewell. Boo had been an integral part of Jem and Scout’s childhood, and, in the midst of their burgeoning adulthood, he serves as a link between their past and their present. Once an imagined enemy and a source of perceived danger, Boo transforms into a true friend and ally, helping them at crucial moments in their transition from childhood to maturity. The children’s early perspective of “danger” centered on Boo Radley, and only by understanding the contrast between these imagined dangers and the real dangers of the adult world can they pass from childhood into adulthood. But the children’s shifting interactions with Boo points to another element of maturity as well: the capacity for empathy. Once simply an eccentric figure in the children’s games, Boo ultimately becomes a true human being to them—one who has endured more than his fair share of tragedy and deserves his fair share of honor, respect, and affection.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which sentence is the underlined word a preposition?
    13·1 answer
  • Which sentence from the passage supports the idea that the "world is chiefly indebted" to James Watt and George Stephenson for d
    13·2 answers
  • Complete the analogies:
    12·1 answer
  • In the song the house of the rising sun is there any figurative language?
    7·2 answers
  • Which detail from the text best supports the opinion that Frida Kahlo was a confident woman? Most people showed respect for Dieg
    14·2 answers
  • Which sentence contains an underlined restrictive clause?
    5·2 answers
  • WORTH 30 POINTS BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIST PLS ANSWER FAST
    9·2 answers
  • Please help giving brainlist
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following correctly identifies the parts of a historical narrative?
    9·1 answer
  • What problem is the narrator having?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!