The conducted experiment of Horselenberg et al. (2003) is a replication of the Kassin and Kiechel (1996) findings. They used the classic computer crash paradigm wherein they falsely accused the participants of touching the forbidden keys and used a pseudo-eyewitness who insisted they saw the participants touched the forbidden keys. With all the variables they explored: individual difference in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures; their findings suggest that only fantasy proneness has a relationship with false confessions. The result of this experiment shows that false confessions really occur; and that it is easy to make the participants confess because of the pseudo-eyewitness as evidence that made them internalize they really had touched the forbidden keys that resulted to the computer crash.
The answer to your question is 35 to 44. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Rebecca - proper noun
Car - common noun
Toy - common noun
Mr. Higgins - proper noun
Park - common noun
California - proper noun
McDonald's - proper noun
Class - common noun
Teacher - common noun
Central Park - proper noun
Hope this helps!
Answer: AN INJUNCTION.
Explanation: Injunction means an act of directing with authority, commanding, or prohibiting.
An injunction, legally means a process, granted by a court of justice, and, in some cases, under statutes, by a court of law, whereby an individual is required to do or to refrain from doing certain acts, according to the requirements of the situation of the written order.
From these definitions above, an injunction can simply be defined as an order directing someone to do something or to refrain from doing something.
A cour of justice or a court of law is responsible for granting injunctions and does so with all its backing powers.
