The correct answer would be option C, Property Damage Liability.
Property Damage Liability of Hermione's automobile insurance policy would cover the damage to her friend's care.
Explanation:
If a person has automobile insurance coverage and is driving his friend's car, he gets into an accident and he is at fault, then his insurance coverage will pay the Property Damage Liability.
Property Damage Liability will help you to pay for the repair, caused by the damage due to your fault or mistake. If you cause damage to someone property or vehicle, then this part of the insurance will cover the damage repairs for you.
For example you are driving your friend's car and due to your fault, you get into an accident and the front of the car gets damaged, then Property Damage Liability will pay for the repair of the front of that car of your friend.
Learn more about insurance policies at:
brainly.com/question/6034572
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Could you zoom into the image? Then I can answer it.
Not all instances of computer theft and computer fraud fall under existing statues because the property stolen may be intangible.
The computer fraud and abuse act of 1986 (CFAA) is a United States cybersecurity bill that was enacted in 1986 as an amendment to existing computer fraud law which had been included in the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. The law prohibits accessing a computer without authorization, or in excess of authorization. Prior to computer-specific criminal laws, computer crimes were prosecuted as mail and wire fraud, but the applying law was often insufficient.
The CFAA was written to extend existing tort law to intangible property, while, in theory, limiting federal jurisdiction to cases with a compelling federal interest, where computers of the federal government or certain financial institutions are involved or where the crime itself is interstate in nature.
To learn more about CFAA here
brainly.com/question/27857666
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise"? How does this compare with President Theodore Roosevelt’s argument? Compare their arguments.Which position comes closest to the experience of the modern presidency? (Please note that this is about the institution of the presidency in modern experience, not about an individual president). Which position do you prefer?
The president can express no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justifiably implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise. Such specific grant must be either in the federal constitution or in an act of congress passed in pursuance thereof
A narrative essay is most like a story
