Question

Briefly explain why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.

Answer 1

Answer:

It catches errors,gives confidence in final evidence,ensures that conclusions fit evidence,makes scientist convince other scientists, and makes scientist check and justify own work.

Answer 2

Its important to do so because you never are completely sure on if the scientist is completely accurate and that they have done everything right, that is why every scientist retraces another scientists steps and completely redoes the experiment themselves. Your trying to make sure that your work and factual evidence is 100% accurate and wont be able to be proved wrong