Answer:It was 50 years ago today that the 1964–'65 World's Fair opened in New York City, bringing a plethora of innovative exhibits to Flushing Meadows–Corona Park in Queens. But by the time it closed in October 1965, it was considered a massive money pit, losing millions of dollars for New York City.If Minnesota is successful in securing the honor of hosting the World's Fair it would be the first World's Fair in the United States in almost 40 years. The last World's Fair on US soil took place in New Orleans in 1984 and proved to be financially ruinous for the organizers in 1964.
Explanation:
The most recent specialized expo was held in 2017 in Astana, Kazakhstan, while the most recent world expo was held in 2015 in Milan, Italy. HOPE THIS HELPS:))
The correct answer is <span>avant-garde
These were people of the modernism period who were interested in new and experimental ways to create art with often radical approaches to previous traditions and established norms. They were at the forefront of cultural changes with their ideas on aesthetic changes and other similar things that created the high art idea.</span>
Answer:
The Free Exercise Clause reserves the right of American citizens to accept any religious belief and engage in religious rituals. Free-exercise clauses of state constitutions which protected religious “[o]pinion, expression of opinion, and practice were all expressly protected” by the Free Exercise Clause.[1] The Clause protects not just religious beliefs but actions made on behalf of those beliefs. More importantly, the wording of state constitutions suggest that “free exercise envisions religiously compelled exemptions from at least some generally applicable laws.”[2] The Free Exercise Clause not only protects religious belief and expression; it also seems to allow for violation of laws, as long as that violation is made for religious reasons. In the terms of economic theory, the Free Exercise Clause promotes a free religious market by precluding taxation of religious activities by minority sects
Explanation:
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
A Trust Agreement can be defined as arrangement between the third party or trustees and beneficiary(-ies). In such agreements, trustees or the thhird party take care of property or holds assets for a beneficiary. A trust agreement sets out the rules to be followed by trustees, who holds the assets, for beneficiary(-ies).
Companies, who form trust agreements, do so to turn over their stocks to trustees or the third party and create one larger company.
Therefore, option C is correct.
The House of Representatives, the seats in this house are given by population of each state. For example, Alaska has 40
