Containment is a geopolitical strategic foreign policy pursued by the United States. It is loosely related to the term cordon sanitaire which was later used to describe the geopolitical containment of the Soviet Union in the 1940s.
I would first go with A. Then move to C if not correct.
personally, I believe people will go without them, but it is also very possible people will look elsewhere for them, but its all a matter of perspective. I think that if the economy cannot produce the goods and services, no where else is able to either, thus, you'd go without it, and it isnt to say you wont want it. You will, maybe even more so. And I doubt people will focus on needs more than they already are, unless it gets worse for the consumer itself in that regard. I cant say im right though.
<span>The Cold War was in many ways a very polarized ideological battle. In it capitalism represented the power of the individual, which is integral to the ideas upon which the United States was built, and communism represented equality of outcome for all individuals, an idea based on the power of the state. Because America was founded on freedom from state corruption, communism was seen as a form of complicit slavery to the state. One of the biggest cultural impacts on the United States as a result of these events would be a very strong sense of patriotism, especially in the baby boomer generation. This causes many Americans to see world issues as resultant of an imbalance of cultural freedoms.</span>
In a mixed market economy, one typical way the government can reduce unemployment would be: <span>The government can pay for projects to create work.
In mixed market economy, both the government and the private sector could work together and influence the economy.
For example, the government could hire a contractor fro private sector to build a bridge. This will not only improved the city's infrastructure but also provide a lot of construction jobs at the same time.</span>
