Based on the results of cross-sectional intelligence testing, <u>younger </u><u>generations were considered to be</u><u> smarter</u><u> than older ones fo</u>r the first half of the twentieth century.
According to the research, it should be noted that intelligence increases in childhood. It then peaks in adolescence then it gradually decreases as one grows older.
The article further stated that younger people are smarter than older ones. Therefore, younger generations were considered to be smarter than older ones for the first half of the twentieth century.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25577952
The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Abraham Lincoln, the president he released slaves from slavery on January 1st 1863
The majority of Europeans describe themselves as Christians, divided into a large number of denominations. Christianity, more specifically the Catholic Church, which played an important in the shaping of Western civilization since at least the 4th century. .....Hope this helped you
