<em>You didn't provide a list of options, so let me just explain the difference between primary sources and secondary sources in studying history.</em>
Primary sources are things that come from persons directly involved in the events or lives being studied. So, let's say World War II is our subject. Any diary entries or letters (like the diary of Anne Frank or a letter by a soldier) would count as primary sources. So would any official proclamations or letters or government documents -- such as the Constitution of France or a declaration of war by US Congress.
Secondary sources are written by historians or others after their study of primary sources. A biography of Napoleon, or a historical article about one of America's founding fathers, or a textbook on world history -- all of those would be secondary sources.
Answer:
Alluvial soil is a fertile soil rich in potassium. It is highly suitable for agriculture, especially for crops such as paddy , sugarcane and plantain. Red soil has high iron content and is fit for crops like red gram, Bengal gram , green gram, groundnut and castor seed.
Explanation:
You answer would be 1994, 2002.
The fast track authority is when the President of the United States holds the power is negotiate agreements internationally that congress can't filibuster and/or amend. It was in effect 1975-1994 and renamed trade promotion authority in 2002.
I hope this helped!
Answer:
Explanation:
Hindus believe that if they don't eat meat it minimizes hurting other life forms.
Nonviolence
The principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) applied to animals is connected with the intention to avoid negative karmic influences which result from violence. The suffering of all beings is believed to arise from craving and desire, conditioned by the karmic effects of both animal and human action. The violence of slaughtering animals for food, and its source in craving, reveal flesh eating as one mode in which humans enslave themselves to suffering.[19] Hinduism holds that such influences affect the person who permits the slaughter of an animal, the person who kills it, the person who cuts it up, the person who buys or sells meat, the person who cooks it, the person who serves it up, and the person who eats it. They must all be considered the slayers of the animal.[19] The question of religious duties towards the animals and of negative karma incurred from violence (himsa) against them is discussed in detail in Hindu scriptures and religious law books.
Answer:
the answer is June 14, 1866
Explanation:
