Answer:
Historical significance is the process used to evaluate what was significant about selected events, people, and developments in the past. Historians use different sets of criteria to help them make judgements about significance.
Explanation:
Answer:
O A. It is highly personal and makes assumptions about other people's feelings.
Explanation:
The <u>credibility of any historical source depends on the nature of the source</u>. If it is an <u>unbiased and have a valid proof of the claim/ argument</u> made, then we can say that the source is credible.
On reading the given passage, we can safely assume that it is not a credible source. One, because it <u>contains a highly personal opinion</u> of the Haitian Revolution. And two, it <u>makes assumptions about the feelings of others</u>, especially the slaves<em> "who worked on [his/her] plantation"</em>. The speaker felt that the slaves in his plantation <em>"were much happier before the plantation [.. and would] like things to go back to the way they were"</em>. This <u>personal and assumptive opinion makes it easy for historians to question the source's credibility.
</u>
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
Answer:
By the 1700's the Native Americans tamed some of the buffalo, which made hunting easier. The Native Americans moved with the herds so they can have a good supply of food. ... The rest of the buffalo was used for clothing, shelter and weapons. Native American knew that their survival depended on the buffalo.
Explanation:
Answer:
dwellings and shelters need to be located near sources of water and food
food and water had to be accessible in order for survival
