The koran is to islam as the BIBLE is to christianity
No, it is generally false that the <span>Civil Rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s did not do much to help African-Americans, since in fact there were many laws passed during this time that made the lives of African Americans better. </span>
Answer:
Okay this might be wrong but it might not, "True"
Explanation:
The political, economic, and military strength of the Union was much greater than that of the Confederacy. However, the war did last four years. The Confederacy proved itself resilient on many occasions. Throughout the war the tide constantly shifted, and with that so did the political, economic, and military strength of either side. Although each side had its share of military successes, in the end, the superior Northern economy, centralized government and overwhelming manpower would eventually lead to victory. In mid 1863, both the Union and the Confederacy could have won the war although; the Confederacy lacked the industry, or manpower to wage a long war with the Union.
The Union was far more industrialized than the South. The North possessed 80% of total U.S. industry. In addition, most Confederate industry was located in the Upper South-particularly in Virginia. The Confederacy lost a great deal of potential industry and manpower when West Virginia, Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland joined the Union instead of the Confederacy. The loss of these states to the Union was as much a testament to shrewd northern politics (Maryland) as it was to opposition within the states (West Virginia). Confederate industry, especially with the loss of these states, was unable to compete with the Union.
In addition to the South's lack of industry, most capital was invested in slaves and land-both of these are non-liquid. The South's lack of a large supply of liquid capital made it difficult for Southerners to buy munitions for the war effort. As a result of the South's lack of liquid capital the North enjoyed a decided advantage..
Glad to help :)
-liyah❤
Answer:
-Because the oldest male was the head of the household, he held powers of life and death over every member of his extended family.
-A Roman woman belonged to either her husband or her father.
-A Roman woman did not have her own full name, just the female version of her father's clan name.
Explanation:
A patriarchal society is a society where men lead the household, so the fact that the oldest male was the head of the household, women belonged to either their father or husband, and a woman took her father's clan name all fall under the of a patriarchal society.
