Answer:
The French Revolution resulted from two state crises which emerged during the 1750s–80s, one constitutional and one financial, with the latter providing a 'tipping point' in 1788/89 when desperate action by government ministers backfired and unleashed a revolution against the 'Ancien Regime.' In addition to these, there was the growth of the bourgeoisie, a social order whose new wealth, power, and opinions undermined the older feudal social system of France. The bourgeoisie were, in general, highly critical of the pre-revolutionary regime and acted to change it, although the exact role they played is still hotly debated among historians.
Maupeou, the Parlements, and Constitutional Doubts
From the 1750s, it became increasingly clear to many Frenchmen that the constitution of France, based on an absolutist style of monarchy, was no longer working. This was partly due to failures in government, be they the squabbling instability of the king's ministers or embarrassing defeats in wars, somewhat a result of new enlightenment thinking, which increasingly undermined despotic monarchs, and partly due to the bourgeoisie seeking a voice in the administration. The ideas of 'public opinion,' 'nation,' and 'citizen' emerged and grew, along with a sense that the state's authority had to be defined and legitimized in a new, broader framework which took more notice of the people instead of simply reflecting the monarch's whims. People increasingly mentioned the Estates General, a three-chambered assembly which hadn't met since the seventeenth century, as a possible solution that would allow the people—or more of them, at least—to work with the monarch. There wasn't much demand to replace the monarch, as would happen in the revolution, but a desire to bring monarch and people into a closer orbit which gave the latter more say.
that i i got my fingers hurt brainly plz
Explanation:
The most accurate answer is number 3. muslims defended Jerusalem because it was sacred to them.
Answer:
BECAUSE it is (was) a communist country, the government can decide which pictures their country can and cannot post on the internet (they choose what they want outsiders to see)........ another point is that the government takes away the power of the bourgeoisie (the ruling class, who own the means of production) and establish worker control of the means of production. Our society is different in the terms that they do not take power away from the rich... so the streets have more poverty.
Hope this helps!
Poverty
Poverty and joblessness are key problems for many of the Native American groups across the United States, and New Mexico is no exception. According the the US Census Bureau, 27% of all Native Americans live in poverty. In reporting done in 2012 in New Mexico, 40% of all Native American children (under age 18) in the state were living in households below the poverty level defined by the federal government. 22% of all Native American children in New Mexico were shown to be living in households where the parent(s) were without employment.
