The use of effective contracts with penalties could reduce the following forms of supply chain risks:
- Distribution
- Logistic delays or damages
- Supplier failure to deliver
<h3>
What are supply chain risks?</h3>
Supply chain risk management is "the implementation of strategies to manage routine and non-routine risks in the supply chain to reduce vulnerability and ensure continuity based on ongoing risk assessment".
<h3>
What are effective contracts?</h3>
Most contracts only need to contain two elements to be legally effective: the parties must agree (after one party has made an offer and the other has accepted it).
Something of value, such as money, services or goods (or a promise to exchange such goods) must be exchanged for something else of value.
Learn more about Effective Contracts:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Full Question
The use of effective contracts with penalties could reduce which form of supply chain risk?
A. Distribution
B. Logistic delays or damages
C. Supplier failure to deliver
D. All of the above Question:
Answer:
Pollution permits are a market-based scheme aimed at reducing pollution and trying to encourage firms to reduce the quantity of pollution they create.
Explanation:
Answer: -18.80% for bond J, -15.46% for bond K
Explanation:
If interest rates suddenly rise by 2 percent, the percentage price change of bond J is -18.80% while the percentage price change of bond K is -15.46%
The calculation is provided below
Answer:
1. $12.31
2. -11.96%
Explanation:
a) Calculation to determine the intrinsic value of a share of Xyrong stock
First step is to calculate the Required Return
Using this formula
Required Return = Risk-free Rate + [Beta * (Expected Market Return - Risk-free Rate)]
Let plug in the formula
Required Return= 5.5% + [2.7 * (17% - 5.5%)]
Required Return= 5.5% + 31.05% = 36.55%
Second step is to calculate g using this formula
g = ROE * (1 - Payout Ratio)
Let plug in the formula
g= 18% * (1 - 0.25)
g= 13.5%
D0 = EPS0 * Payout Ratio = $10 * 0.25 = $2.50
P0 = [D0 * (1 + g)] / [r - g]
= [$2.50 * (1 + 0.135)] / [0.3655 - 0.135]
= $2.8375 / 0.2305 = $12.31
b). Holding Period Return = [P1 + D1 - P0] / P0
= [$8 + $2.8375 - $12.31] / $12.31 = -$1.4727 / $12.31 = -0.1196, or -11.96%
Answer:
Shoe-leather Costs.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Bob manages a grocery store in a country experiencing a high rate of inflation. He is paid in cash twice per month. On payday, he immediately goes out and buys all the goods he will need over the next two weeks in order to prevent the money in his wallet from losing value.
What he can't spend, he converts into a more stable foreign currency for a steep fee. This is an example of the Shoes-leather costs of inflation.
A Shoe-leather costs refers to the costs of time, energy and effort people expend to mitigate the effect of high inflation on the depreciative purchasing power of money by frequently visiting depository financial institutions in order to minimize inflation tax they pay on holding cash.
Metaphorically, it ultimately implies that in order to protect the value of money or assets, some people wear out the sole of their shoes by going to financial institutions more frequently to make deposits.
Hence, Bob is practicing a shoe-leather cost of inflation so as to reduce the nominal interest rates.
