Answer:
The conditions under which each funding method for paying for IT system expenses would be recommended are:
Allocation method is preferred to other methods when actual usage cannot be captured but, some other cost drivers can be used as the allocation bases.
Chargeback method works better than others when actual usage by each unit can be accurately captured.
Explanation:
The Allocation Funding Method charges IT costs to individuals, departments, or business units based on revenues, number of employees, and other cost drivers and not based on usage. It is often used when actual usage cannot be recorded.
The chargeback method charges IT costs to individuals, departments, or business units based on their actual usage of the IT services.  With wide variation in IT usage, business units need to be charged their actual costs consumed.
The corporate budget method allocates IT cost based on a periodic predetermined rate. It is used where unit managers need to be given control over their budgets, enabling them to search for cost-saving technologies.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
<u>Focused-differentiation.</u>
Explanation:
A focused differentiation strategy is a strategy used by organizations to reach a group of customers through the marketing of differentiated products and services that provide added benefits to the consumer.
This strategy is characterized by the combination of the business strategies developed by <em>Porter</em>, which are:
- Cost leadership
- Differentiation and
- Focus.
The greatest benefits added to this strategy are the increase in consumer loyalty, since offering targeted and differentiated services guarantees the improvement of service, quality and increase of the company's reputation.
There is also the possibility of increasing profits, due to the sale of differentiated and exclusive products, which may have a higher purchase and sale value.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C. a derived demand.
Explanation:
Derived demand is a rise in the demand of a product due to the increase in demand for related or intermediate goods.  If two distinct goods or services are used together, a rise in the demand of one will cause the demand for the other to rise. Products or services used together are called complementary goods. 
Derived demand is primarily as a result of the usage of a product in the production or consumption of other goods or services. In this case, the demand for workers is solely due to a rise in the demand for cars. Should the demand for vehicles decrease, then the demand for workers will fall. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Explanation:
We were informed from the question that;
BEFORE; the tax, 30,000 bottles of wine were sold every week at a price of $4 per bottle.
AFTER; After the tax, 25,000 bottles of wine are sold every week; consumers pay $6 per bottle and producers receive $3 per bottle (after paying the tax). 
✓✓The amount of tax on wine = $6 - $3 = $3 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on consumers = The amount paid after tax - The amount paid before tax
= $6 - $4
=$2 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on Producers = Price received before tax - price received after tax
= $4 - $3
=$1 per bottle
 Hence, The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $3 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $2 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $1 per bottle. 
 The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers(FALSE)
This is false, since the The tax burden on Producers is $1 per bottle while that of The tax burden on consumer is $2 per bottle.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
1. $46,000
2.$46,000
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows,
Inventory price = 230,000 pesos
1. Consolidated balance sheet amount = Inventory price × Rate on November 1, 2017
= 230,000 × $0.20 
= $46,000
2. Consolidated statement cost of goods sold for the year ending December 31, 2018  = Inventory price × Rate on November 1, 2017
= 230,000 × $0.20 
= $46,000