1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
3 years ago
12

How successful was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor? Did they accomplish the objectives they set out to accomplish? Explain w

hy or why not.
History
1 answer:
sesenic [268]3 years ago
5 0
The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor for the main reason of tension in the Pacific. The Americans weren't necessarily in the conflict at this point, but were sitting in the Pacific watching the Japanese, if the Japanese were to grow in power, they can't have the Americans on their tail. The attack counterattacked the Japanese if you really look at it. Most people would relate the Pearl Harbor attacks as "poking the sleeping bear with a stick", and that's true. We turned the fighting back to the Japanese in the months after the attack. And four long years later, we dropped the "Little Boy" atomic bomb on island town of Hiroshima -- And the second bomb called "Fat Man" on Nagasaki 3 days later. The Japanese surrendered less than a month after the bombings. So, the attacks of Pearl Harbor really hurt the Japanese more than it hurt the Americans.
You might be interested in
From which city did paul revere begin his famous ride
Elena L [17]

Answer:

Lexington

hope this helps you

5 0
3 years ago
On 2006, former iraq ruler Saddam Hussein
EleoNora [17]
Died from Navy Seals
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would the world be different, if Mexico and the United States had not gone to war?
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

daddy

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What negotiations would you suggest for countries who are hostile toward each other
mina [271]
I would strongly suggest indaba. It allows each country to be heard and they can come to a conclusion quickly. They can only voice their opinion in a certain way. A country gives their Red Line in a diplomatic way and the other can respond with their hard limits.
5 0
3 years ago
The peer review process can create conflicts of interest because the choice of who reviews a potentially publishable project may
Alexandra [31]
<span>The peer review process can create a conflict of interest because favoritism can be shown. Peers often want to support their friends or those close to them so will choose their projects over others. They are trying to help those they care about to succeed.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • To what extent, were American women in support of Wilson’s foreign policy during the early years of world war 1
    11·1 answer
  • What was the main cause of death for most of the indigenous people in Hispaniola?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the demonstration of Martin Luther Kings speech
    13·2 answers
  • The issue of secession was argued prior to the outbreak of the Civil War. Which area of Tennessee attempted to create an indepen
    9·2 answers
  • What was a major problem with the central government under the Articles of Confederation?
    5·2 answers
  • Why Was Saratoga the turning Point of the revolutionary war?
    7·2 answers
  • The blank of plants was a turning point in human history
    13·1 answer
  • What individual right did the Justinian code protect for women?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these is a civil liberty protected by the Bill of Rights?
    15·1 answer
  • Depressions are regularly occurring phase of?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!