STEP 1
Describe the work and its creator in the first paragraph. Do not assume that readers know the work or author, so place the work in context. Ask yourself if the text is a first outing for the author or the latest in a long series. Does the author have a reputation or expertise in a certain field? Is the work controversial or well-known or little-known, and why? Describe the intended audience for the work.
STEP 2
Write an accurate summary of the work’s main ideas in the second paragraph. Do not mingle your evaluation with the summary. Merely explain the most important ideas the author tried to convey in the entire work.
STEP 3
Judge the author’s presentation in the third paragraph. Did the author present accurate and relevant data in a logical manner? Did the author clearly define important terms or jargon? Did the author offer sound interpretations? Focus, in this paragraph, on whether the author achieved his or her purpose for creating the work.
STEP 4
State both your agreement and disagreement with the author in the fourth paragraph. Develop your ideas by explaining why you agree and disagree with the author’s ideas. Cite other critics who support your interpretation.
STEP 5
Compose the conclusion, often the shortest paragraph in the critique. Restate the main agreements and objections to the work. In the closing, do not mention any new idea that does not appear.in the body paragraphs. The final paragraph gives an overview of the entire essay by restating its main ideas.
Shakespeare has used the word fawn rather than a synonym such as a flatter to describe his actions because fawn is more negative, suggesting manipulation of another for personal gain.
<h3>What is the use of synonym words? </h3>
The word fawn implies a young deer that represent immaturity. It means it could be used to express the pessimistic manipulative behavior of a person.
However, flatter is giving a positive perspective that arises from a praising scenario.
Thus, it fawn word is more appropriate to show how Cassius is <u>influencing</u> Brutus for his personal gain.
Learn more about Shakespeare here:
brainly.com/question/12122577
Claudettes tone of stage 2 lycanthropic culture shock is “annoyed” according to page 234, it states “ .... and than who would get blamed for the dark spots of duck blood on our Peter Pan collars? Who would get penalized with negative skill points? Exactly.” In this statement Claudette expresses a sort of hatred towards her younger sister.
Answer:
Science fiction assumes that the universe bursts with life, but scientists aren't so sure.
Explanation:
According to the given paragraph about the low probability of finding life in other planets or galaxies, the most effective topic sentence for the paragraph is Science fiction assumes that the universe bursts with life, but scientists aren't so sure.
This is because, a topic sentence is a brief statement of the main point of an essay.
