The miserable living conditions that existed in the slums of New York City in the 1880s are discussed in the summary of the passage.
Jacob Riis's book "How the Other Half Lives" was a documentary that was published in the 1880s that revealed the deplorable living conditions that existed in the slums of New York City. The author made a documentary on the slums, the immigrants who lived there, the maltreatment they endured, and the ailments they suffered from. Jacob was a police reporter who got acquainted with tenement life and, through his work, brought attention to the appalling situation of the people who lived there. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is How the Other Half Lives?</h3>
Generally, Jacob Riis's How the Other Half Lives was a groundbreaking piece of photography that documented the deplorable living conditions in New York City slums in the 1880s. The book was titled How the Other Half Lives. By bringing the slums to the attention of the upper and middle classes in New York City, it laid the groundwork for subsequent muckraking journalism.
In conclusion, Poor people in New York City's slums in the 1880s had appalling living circumstances, as described in the excerpt's synopsis. New York's slums in the 1880s were shown in "How the Other Half Lives," a documentary by Jacob Riis. The author spoke on the hardships individuals in slums encountered, including living conditions, immigration, abuse, and illness. As a police reporter, Jacob was able to see the deplorable conditions in which tenement dwellers often found themselves and bring this information to the public's notice.
Read more about How the Other Half Lives
brainly.com/question/4980740
#SPJ1
On this date in 1821, Missouri entered the Union as the 24th state. It was the first one located entirely west of the Mississippi River.
By 1818, the Missouri Territory, part of the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, had gained enough settlers to qualify for statehood. Its settlers, however, had come mostly from the South and expected it would be a slave state. When a Missouri statehood bill came before the House, Rep. James Tallmadge of New York proposed amending the measure to bar bringing slaves into the new state and providing for the ultimate emancipation of all slaves born in Missouri. The House approved that approach in 1819. But the Senate refused to go along.
In early 1820, a bill to admit Maine passed the House. Alabama had come into the Union as a slave state in 1819. With Alabama's admission, there were an equal number of senators from free and slave states in that body. Since Maine would come in as a free state, proponents of admitting Missouri as a slave state argued that equality would be retained at 12 each by pairing the two.
The Senate then voted to bar slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri ? except in Missouri. Although the House rejected this compromise, conferees agreed that Missourians could adopt a constitution that permitted slavery.
But the House rebelled anew when a drafted state constitution barred bringing any free blacks into Missouri. The territorial legislature backed down and pledged that nothing in its constitution could be interpreted as abridging the rights of U.S. citizens. (Slaves were not citizens.) That deal held until 1854, when the Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. In 1861, when other slave states seceded to trigger the Civil War, Missouri chose to remain in the Union.
The answer would be A. Have the Defendant pay a higher bail amount... Judges I don't believe can take away a person right of bail because of the "innocent until proven Guilty". They won't have the defendant followed by the police 24/7 but they may have them monitored. And judges CANNOT take away a person right to a trial.
<span>One way in which President Abraham Lincoln's 48 suspension of habeas corpus, the Espionage Act, and the USA Patriot Act, are similar is that these actions?
The answer is it </span><span>restricted civil liberties during wartime.</span>
