1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
egoroff_w [7]
3 years ago
10

Why is it difficult to interpret recent history and current events

History
1 answer:
r-ruslan [8.4K]3 years ago
3 0
It is difficult to inherit or get recent history and current events because, there are numerous and variable interpretations of events and their significance. It is also hard to see a current event from an historical perspective. That's why.

Have a Warm and Wonderful Day! 
You might be interested in
What was the effect of the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland?
Alexxandr [17]

C. It legitimized the power of the national government over states

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
18. Railroads encouraged the growth of settlements in the West because they
katrin2010 [14]
The answer is D.......
3 0
3 years ago
Write a short note on :-<br> 1. Battle of Bunar<br> 2. Battle of Wandiwash<br> 3. Battle of Plassey
kow [346]
2.The Battle of Wandiwash was a decisive battle in India during the Seven Years' War. The Count de Lally's army, burdened by a lack of naval support and funds, attempted to regain the fort at Vandavasi, now in Tamil Nadu. He was attacked by Sir Eyre Coote's forces and decisively defeated. The French general Marquis de Bussy-Castelnau and the French were then restricted to Pondichéry, where they surrendered on 16 January 1761. Wandiwash is the Anglicised pronunciation of Vandavasi.

3. The Battle of Plassey was a decisive victory of the British East India Company over the Nawab of Bengal and his French[1] allies on 23 June 1757. The battle consolidated the Company's presence in Bengal, which later expanded to cover much of India over the next hundred years.


About Battle of Bunar Maybe you mistaked
the spelling
It may be Battle of Buxar
Or battle of bunker
Tell me which and I will answer you about it in the comments OK!
8 0
3 years ago
Do the actions taken against the armenians seem like acceptable wartime actions?
Rashid [163]

Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.

7 0
3 years ago
What would have happened to Lee's men if he had tried to break through the
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

the main target of the Union Army has been Richmond, the capital of the ... Lee explaining that they are under attack by a large portion of Grant's army. Northern forces try for three days to break through the Confederate trench line, ... will it take to break the Confederacy:" and "How many more men will have to die?

Explanation:

Hope this answer helps you :)

Have a great day

Mark brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The final competition for elective office is called the
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains Spanish interaction with American indains
    9·1 answer
  • Has the U.S foreign policy been good for the world ? Why or why not
    9·1 answer
  • First to answer gets brainliest!
    12·2 answers
  • why did some asian nations become democratic while others were led by dictators or communist governments
    12·1 answer
  • I can't figure this one out i could use some help
    9·1 answer
  • based on the law of superposition, in undisturbed rock bed, where should the youngest rock layers be found?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the term for the legal process by which someone becomes a U.S. citizen?
    8·2 answers
  • What did the house of representative vote for?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the main effect of the Peloponnesian War?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!