I believe the answer is: <span> preservation of evidence.
</span><span> preservation of evidence is critically important because the genetic Trace or fingerprints that left on the evidence could be easily erased.
When such evidence is erased, the justice department wouldn't have sufficient proof when they are prosecuting the suspects.
</span>
Answer: False. In order to become member of society, person has to interact with society. He has to be involve in its everyday activities to a member let alone an effective member. A person who does not do this cannot be counted as a member of society if he has done anything for it.
After months of singing "itsy bitsy spider" with her mother, baby Nicole is beginning to do some of the song's actions by herself. This is an example of <span>scaffolding.
Scaffolding refers to a learning process that is tailored to stronger understanding and independence. When Nicole is sang to, she is able to get a great understanding of how to do it on her own and then eventually started to do all of that on her own. By learning this way, baby Nicole is getting a stronger understanding of how to develop further learning on her own.
</span>
Answer:
Answer is Leader-Member Exchange theory.
Explanation:
This Leader-member exchange theory brings about a situation where the leader develops an exchange with his/her followers, thereby influencing the actions of their followers such as their performances and decisions.
This method is focused to bring the best out of the members, that is , the leaders and the followers, if adopted well.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
