Most, but not all, sociologists agree that it is unethical to misrepresent themselves.
In any type of investigation, it is important that the researcher identifies himself, the purpose of his investigations and requests the consent of the respondents. The sociologist and other researchers will question the idea of full disclosure during the investigation, citing changes in respondents. As sociologists study social patterns and relationships, it is expected that respondents in a sociological study will only present information that is considered socially acceptable, taking care of the political and cultural context of their points of view. For the sociologist, it is important to have a complete disclosure and to convince respondents to provide honest answers, that´s why its important to never misrepresent themselves, to be taken seriously.
The actual answer is the <em><u>corpus callosum</u></em> hope this helps :)
Answer:
no
Explanation:
its was a very dangerous terrain
An influx of people meant the risk of overcrowding, which in turn meant that cities often didn’t have enough space to accommodate everyone. People living in close quarters without proper hygiene + newly or poorly developed sanitation systems = disease.
The commercial revolution which was the predecessor for the industrial revolution (which is widely known), had a major impact on daily life in general, but especially trading. The commercial revolution involved the creation of established and stable trading routes all around the world which traded in various materials (spice, silk, metals, etc.) all of this drastically affected daily life as well.
