Answer:
A) China.
Explanation:
The Open Door policy by John Hay was expressed in the series of notes aimed to avoid the potential threat of dividing China among various sphere of influence by nations primarily by Russia, France, Germany, and Great Britain. Therefore, protection of equal privileges between these trading countries and to support China in its territorial and administrative integrity. Hay claimed that ensuring fair access to trade would favor the American economy, and he hoped the Open Door would also avoid conflicts between China's forces.
Hurricanes occur there because of the seasonal patterns.
B does not make sense.
Forest fires are not necessarily a natural event.
Answer: B
Explanation: The correct answer is letter B, the potential for personal growth.
Psychoanalytic theory developed by Freud describes how our childhood experiences, sexual and unconscious urges determine our personality and potentialy mental disorder.
All over his theory, Freud described mechanisms of symptom formation according to his theory of the unconscious and how to treat them but never talked about how to grow as a personal level.
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
