There are several ways you can think about this split—the wild vs. the domesticated, the free vs. the enslaved, the rugged individual vs. society, the genuine vs. the artificial. I think the message of the poem, however, has to do with freedom of expression and the need to be independent of corrupting social influences
Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
To move the reader toward the story's climax.
The answer would be 15.
The first equation would be ∠1 = 15°
Then the second equation is ∠2 = (3 * 15 + 30)° which simplifies to 75°
And since complementary angles need to equal 90° to be true we have to add both angles. So, ∠1 (= 15°) + ∠2 (= 75°) = 90°. Now that we know they equal 90°, 15 would be the answer to your problem.
