As a result of the Hundred Year's war England lost almost all of its possessions in France the only part that it retained was Pale of Calais.
<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
The Supreme Court is responsible for passing Constitutional Amendments :)
I hope this helps!!! :)
The answer is a
hope this helps
<span />
The main reason why <span>this statement was significant to the American public at the time was because Americans at this time were isolationist, and didn't want to feel as though they were getting involved in another foreign conflict. </span>
