To find out the thickness of each book you would have to divide 135 inches by 60 to get 2.25 .
135 ÷ 60 = 2.25
so the answer would be A
Answer:
a) point estimate is 30%
b) null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. </em>
Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals
ie 30%
<em>b.</em>
Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
<em>c.</em>
z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
- p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
- N is the sample size (600)
then z=
= 1.655
Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.
The needle at the top of the model should be 3.5 inches.
Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
An input can't have 2 outputs. But, an output can have an 2 inputs.
Hope this helped!
Answer: it’s a fraction and it’s 2/5
Step-by-step explanation: