Answer:
cylinder:
curved sa = 2πrh
=> rectangle, breath = h, width = perimeter of circle = 2πr
total sa = 2πrh+2πr^2
=> curved sa + area of 2 circles
cone:
curved sa = πrl
=> treated as a triangle, base = circumference of circle, height = slant height
total sa = πr^2+πrl
=> curved sa + area of base (circle)
Since this can't happen, let's suppose that P=150, then:
Now we have to move the 100 to the other side of the equation with a negative sign to get this:
Finally, to get w, we move the 2 that's multiplying to the other side dividing the 50:
Therefore, the width of the rectangle would be 25 ft if the perimeter is 150ft, and we can see how the rectangle would look:
❤️Hello!❤️For experimental data it may be good to use linear regression.
For precise data you do not need linear regression.
Step-by-step explanation: If you have a number of experimentally generated data points that are subject to inaccuracies then you can use something like linear regression to generate a linear model that fits the data reasonably well. Many modern calculators have a linear regression capability.
On the other hand, if you are given precise data, you should be able to generate a model that fits the data exactly. For example, given points (
x
1
,
y
1
) and (
x
2
,
y
2
) which are supposed to lie on a line, the equation of the line in point-slope form is:
y
−
y
1
=
m
(
x
−
x
1) where m
=
y
2
−
y
1
x
2
−
x
1 from which we can derive the slope-intercept form:
y
=
m
x
+
c where c
=
y
1
−
m
x
1. ☯️Hope this helps!☯️ ↪️ Autumn ↩️
Mark mebrisnloest and I will feed u
