1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
10

Read the passage from Elizabethan Etiquette. Next, the salt cellar was placed on the table. The cellar, or container, for the sa

lt was decorative, and the main adornment for most tables. It occupied a place of honor, and as such, the placement of the salt also determined where guests sat, with the host and his or her most honored guests on one side and guests of lesser importance on the other. Therefore, no one sat down until the salt cellar, also simply called "the salt," was placed. All guests would be led into the dining hall, in order of their importance. The lord, or host, would sit at the head of the table, with the most honored guests on the right and the least honored on the left. Guests would always wash their hands prior to beginning the meal, and grace was said before the food was served. Which factors affected when guests could begin a meal in Elizabethan England? Check all that apply. when the attendees arrived when the grace was said when the salt cellar was placed when the lord greeted the guests when the guests washed their hands
English
2 answers:
stepan [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A,B,C, and E

Explanation:

all accept D i just took the test

AlexFokin [52]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer here would be <u>all the options except D</u><u>.</u>

Before the guests could eat certain rules of etiquette had to followed. First the salt would be put on the table. After that until all have been seated and all have washed their hands no one could eat anything. And even after all that first they would say their prayer and then eat.
You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from "remembering to never forget: dominican republic’s ‘parsley massacre’" by mark memmott. passage a: this we
Iteru [2.4K]

These excerpts work together to develop a central idea by discussing that Memmott explains that the tragedy is not well known today and then shows why it is worth remembering.

<h3>What is the summary of the Dominican republic’s ‘parsley massacre’?</h3>

Dominican soldiers mostly from distant parts of the nation flowed into the area Between October 2 and October 8. A cruel dictator in the Dominican Republic murdered hundreds of Haitians.

The Border of Lights ceremony is described in the first passage. Whereas second passage reflects the circumstances that gave rise to the beginning of this festival.

Learn more about the "parsley massacre", here:

brainly.com/question/13043319

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
what are the similarities and differences of reading and writing. write at least 2-3 similarities and differences.
katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

The similarities of writing and reading is that they both are recursive processes . Writing you have to put alot of depth and thought into making your sentences and paragraphs, you roam with ideas to make your story. While in reading your trying to comprehend what the writer has given to you and fully understand its story .

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Explain how pausing for a moment of silence on Memorial Day honors people who have died in service to the United States.
love history [14]

Answer:

It is a sign of respect

Explanation:

To raise Americans' awareness of the honorable contributions made by those who died while defending our nation. To encourage all Americans to honor those who died as a result of service to this nation by pausing for one minute at 3:00 p.m. (local time) on Memorial Day.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is the MOST appropriate transitional word to add to this sentence?
White raven [17]

Answer: D. Therefor

Explanation:

Because it, seems very professional and something that good writers would include in a sentence.

* Hopefully this helps:) Mark me the brainliest:)

<em>∞ 234483279c20∞</em>

4 0
3 years ago
What are 2 cons bad things about changing DNA?
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

cons are:

*it may lead to genetic defects

*it limits genetic diversity

*over population

*negative side affects

*unfavorable diversity

pros:

*you have a potential to live longer

*tackling and defeating illness becomes easier

Explanation:

if you need some pros on it just tell me!

                  <em>~Roma~</em>

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Naturalism is more of a writing method than a philosophy. True or False
    13·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from chapter 3 of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
    8·2 answers
  • DO CHILDREN NEED<br>PRIVACY IN THEIR LIVES,<br>SUPPORT?​
    12·1 answer
  • The rules and conventions governing correct or polite behavior and communication are called ______________.
    11·1 answer
  • In this excerpt from "A Modest Proposal" by Johnathan Swift, what does the author list?
    15·1 answer
  • 4. What is true about Baba? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • What is the theme of the list of things that will not change
    15·1 answer
  • Newton’s third law says that every time there is an ______________________________ force, there is also a ______________________
    10·1 answer
  • Identify the clause<br> Is that the boy whose father won the drawing for a new car?
    5·1 answer
  • Read the following passage.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!