The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The economic questions that are not covered in Mark's scenario could be the following.
Mark needs to ask about what its competitors might be. Direct and indirect competitors in the zone. He has to know the kind of products they are selling, their prices, offers, and promotions, so he can make business decisions.
Another question he is missing is his business plan. He needs a full business plan so he can consider all aspects and variables during the opening and the firsts years. He also needs to ask himself if he has enough resources to outlast the competitors.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Answer:
Academic tenacity
Explanation:
Academic tenacity is referred to as the non-cognitive factors that promote long-term learning and achievement.
Hence Students who believe they belong in school academically and socially, are engaged in learning, and don't let intellectual or social setbacks derail them are exhibiting characteristics of academic tenacity
Do you still need help? If so, I am up for it!
