Answer:
yes sir. this makes my day
Answer:
Following are the responses to the given question:
Explanation:
Please find the complete question.
Yes, value exists. Their price is lower and therefore more competition and benefit are higher. Its value is reduced. Further competition among producers leads to higher production and lower prices. Further good product feedback will increase profitability after their use by consumers. Based on buyers' requirements, drugs can also be added. The drawback is that the output and performance depend more on the producer. Initially, the gain can be very low due to lower prices. Because they are typically replicas of premium products, a distinctive identity becomes difficult to have. Besides, customers get less trust and this problem is worse from the outset.
Answer:
Kelli can deduct up to $6,000 in expenses from her net income, so her net income for this year would be $0. She could have deducted an even larger amount if her net income had been higher (up to $12,000 in deductions), since you can only deduct up to the amount of your net income.
<h3>Some features of such itinerant retailers are:</h3>
- The scale of operations is small. ...
- The capital is also limited in the case of itinerant retailers.
- They usually deal in day to day products and perishable items of daily use like fruits, vegetables, milk, toiletries etc.
Answer: 24%
Explanation:
The following information can be gotten from the question:
Current Assets = $ 400,000
Total Assets = 895,000
Cost of Goods = Sold 655,000
Gross Profit = 205,000
Net Income = 125,000
Gross profit percent will be:
Gross profit/(Gross profit + cost of goods sold) × 100
= 205,000/(205,000 + 655,000) × 100
= 205000/860,000 × 100
= 23.8%
= 24%