1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ratling [72]
3 years ago
13

What makes a parliamentary government different from the United States? Its legislature has authority over the executive branch,

with the ability to select and remove executive leaders.
History
1 answer:
vladimir2022 [97]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be would be that there is no real "executive branch" in a parliamentary system--only a figurehead monarch. </span></span>
You might be interested in
what is a republic? in minds of 18th century Americans, what essential qualities did people need to have for a republic to succe
lara [203]
A republic is a government in which the people and/or elected officials have the most say in the government and a president is elected rather than a monarch. The early founders in creating the American republic believed certain groups were better fit to represent all the people. Due to their position of power in regards to other people, men were seen as the most fit to lead and vote. Additionally, land owners being responsible and invested as well as those 21 and over were considered most fit. Additionally many, especially the Federalists, believed that the elite were most worthy as they were also the most moral. Their education level and ability to be successful meant they were best fit to make good decisions for all. Anti-Federalists, especially Thomas Jefferson believed all men should be involved in the process and a truer form of democracy was needed. He often argued for the right of commoners to revolt and overthrow government if it was needed. The voice of the people should drive all decisions not the voices of a few elites. Federalists feared direct democracy due to the common man's lack of education and inability to be rational. Ultimately Federalists, especially Alexander Hamilton wanted the British system just with a president instead of a king and them in power instead of British Parliament. 
5 0
3 years ago
Under Ramses, the Egyptians regained territory by warring and
NISA [10]
<span>1.  Peace treaty,  Hities King.

2. Temples, economy

3. </span><span>Libyians, Kushikos, and Assyrians.</span>
<span>

</span>
7 0
3 years ago
11. What invader was able to move through North Africa to take over the southernmost part of the Roman Empire?
IrinaK [193]
Did you get these answers? I'm also curious. I think the first in Vandals, but idk about the second one.
7 0
3 years ago
Do you think the U.S. should have pulled out of Afghanistan? Why or why not?
valkas [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Considering that they should never have gone in in the first place, it's about time that they pulled out. I saw a cartoon the other day of an Afghan standing beside the road looking at all the head gear of those trying to conquer the region -- Rome, Russia, one more I can't remember and  The US. It's quite a list. History should have told America to stay out.

If Russia couldn't do it, (and she's much closer to Afghanistan than America is) then it should have been a warning not to try.

3 0
3 years ago
What did the Gulf of Tonkin resolution lead to?
djyliett [7]

Answer: It allowed President Johnson to use military force in Vietnam without declaring war.

The major provision of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was authorization for the US President to do what he felt necessary to bring peace to Southeast Asia.

Detail:

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was a measure passed by US Congress that allowed the US President to make military actions, like increase troops, without formal declaration of war.  It led to huge escalation of US involvement in the Vietnam War. The resolution was passed by Congress in August, 1964, after alleged attacks on two US naval ships in the Gulf of Tonkin.  The key wording in the resolution said:

  • <em>Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.</em>

That resolution served as a blank check for President Johnson to send troops to whatever extent he deemed necessary in pursuance of the war.  Between 1964 and the end of Johnson's presidency in 1969, US troop levels in Vietnam increased from around 20,000 to over 500,000.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which factor aided the growth of settlements in Arkansas territory?
    14·2 answers
  • How did Hypatia contribute to the study of philosophy?
    6·2 answers
  • What defined the rights of British monarchs and citizens
    14·1 answer
  • Regarding use of the media, spin can be defined as
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Gideon v Wainwright case strengthen the rights of persons accused of crimes? A) States only had to provide defendant
    8·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the fair employment practices act
    9·1 answer
  • A large railroad trust that Roosevelt tackled was the
    6·2 answers
  • Which is an example of how the physical environment helped the Aztecs establish an empire?
    6·1 answer
  • If a president is accused of breaking the twenty second amendment that means the president is tying to
    6·2 answers
  • In 1776 ,who did general William Howe defeat
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!