The first main goal was to find a north west passage- a direct route to the pacific ocean.
The second goal was to collect and record new plants and animals species.
The third goal was to make new and accurate maps.
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
That statement is False.
MAslow hierarchy of needs depict a clear path which indicates that people wouldn't be able to fulfill the needs on higher hierarchy if we haven't fulfill the needs on lower hierarchy.
Here's his hierarchy's arrangement from top to bottom:
- self actualization
- Self-esteem
- Love/belonging
- safety
- Physiological
But often times, we do not follow this hierarchy from bottom to top. (for example, some obsessed individual might want to sacrifice need for love/belonging as long as she could realized her life-long dream i.e: self-actualization)
Judicial Review is the Court's Examination of the Constitutionality of the actions of Congress and the President (and the court's right to nullify what the other branches of government have done if they find it unconstitutional). This process was first established by the Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case.
Umm is this like a school question or a normal question I mean you can just search it up
