The cultural center that are most likely to qualify under the1954 Hague cultural property convention are;
- A center square containing monuments representing ancient cultures
- A museum containing artifacts and historical writings.
<h3>What happened at the 1954 Hague cultural property convention?</h3>
The Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Aggressive War is the first international convention that focuses only on cultural property protection in armed conflict. It was signed on 14 May 1954 in The Hague, Netherlands, and went into effect on 7 August 1956.
<h3>Why did the Hague Convention come into being?</h3>
These accords are known as "The Hague Conventions" because they were adopted at the 1899 and 1907 Peace Conferences in The Hague, Netherlands.
They formalize the laws and traditions of war by specifying the regulations that belligerents must observe throughout hostilities.
Hence, it is right to state that the cultural center that are most likely to qualify under the1954 Hague cultural property convention are;
- A center square containing monuments representing ancient cultures
- A museum containing artifacts and historical writings.
Learn more about Hague Cultural Convention:
brainly.com/question/10805709
#SPJ1
Answer:
I think A or B is the answer
Explanation:
By the time World War II ended, most American officials agreed that the best defense against the Soviet threat was a strategy called “containment.” In his famous “Long Telegram,” the diplomat George Kennan (1904-2005) explained the policy: The Soviet Union, he wrote, was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be no permanent modus vivendi [agreement between parties that disagree].” As a result, America’s only choice was the “long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.” “It must be the policy of the United States,” he declared before Congress in 1947, “to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation…by outside pressures.” This way of thinking would shape American foreign policy for the next four decades.
