Answer:
Check Explanation
Explanation:
INDIA is a nation located in Asia. It has one of the fastest growing Economy in the world.
The Economy of India is a developing Economy. INDIA is the world's fifth largest Economy by nominal GDP and in using the IMF Declaration on a per capital income basis, the Economy of India ranked 139th by GDP in using nominal and in using PPP, the Economy of India is the 118th in the world
The main Sources for the Economy of India are agriculture, handicrafts, services and manufacturing industries. India is a mixed Economy
The Economy of Singapore is know as a develop free market Economy, ranking as the most open place for establishing business. In terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), the nation is ranked as the third largest per capital GDP in the world. The Economy of Singapore is very stable and a high incorrect Economy
The Economy of Singapore depends on it Exports of Electronics, chemicals and services
The similarities between the two countries in there Economies is that Both Economies largely depends on it Exports of Goods to other countries and both countries greatly depends on services. India is also developing into an open market Economy while Singapore is an open market Economy
The major difference between the two countries is that Singapore maintain a highly uncorrupted society in there nation but India is widely know for corruption.
The unemployment rate in India is much worse than Singapore.
Lower courts handle the more minor cases that are presented in society on a common basis. Usually these cases get solved or handled faster.
While the higher courts handle the cases that require higher powers and judgment makers. These cases of course go on for years due to many reasons so they take longer to handle.
Please Vote my answer brainliest thanks!
Answer:
B!! B) Identify ANOTHER specific example of how a change in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
Explanation:
Identify another specific example of how a <em><u>CHANGE</u></em> in the rights or roles of women from 1800 to the present corresponds to the argument made in the text.
Answer:
By spying on an opposition, the presidential candidate can try to disrupt their campaign and win in an unethical way.
Explanation:
Spying on an opposition leader can provide information on what kind of voters they are targeting, what messages they are sending out, where they will have fund-raising dinners etc.
With this information, a lot of problems can be created. An example of this is President Nixon who spied on his opposition Edmund Muskie.
His unethical tactics including, disrupting fundraisers, false letters and even a completely made up sexual misconduct charge. All of these, severely disrupted Edmund's campaign and paved the way for a Nixon win.
In modern scholarship, all these tactics are considered anti-democratic.