Answer:
It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.
It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise, It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).
Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.
At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.
Answer:
Their troops were encouraged to go on a rampage which resulted in an series of looting, torture,and massacre of civilians and prisoners of war known as the Rpe of Nanking and the Nanking Massacre. After the japanese attacked the city of nanking, the chinese ordered a ceasefire and tried to make negotiations but they didn't make it in time. The japenese continued for several more days beating back sporadic resistance from the Chinese.
25 minutes late, :( but It is D: It made sure that all stations had to give a reasonable opportunity for both sides of the debate to give their opinion on public airwaves.
It is between the United Kingdom and Northeast Spain. I'm entirely sure, but I hope this helps.
