1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marusya05 [52]
3 years ago
12

According to anthropologists, why did planting crops lead to the rise of a political class? With economic stability came the nee

d for warriors. The more settled a community was the more they needed a form of monetary exchange. As food became more plentiful, people were freed up to serve as community leaders. The crops planted could be used to trade with other cultures. As settlements developed, leaders emerged to help organize and regulate these budding civilizations
History
2 answers:
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
8 0

With economic stability came the need for warriors, as food became more plentiful, people were freed up to serve as community leaders, and as settlements developed, leaders emerged to help organize and regulate these budding civilizations. Hope this helps.

mylen [45]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C) as food became more plentiful, people were freed up to serve as community leaders.

According to anthropologists, planting crops lead to the rise of a political class because as food became more plentiful, people were freed up to serve as community leaders.

Anthropologists considered that once the survival mode ended and basic necessities were covered, humans began to have the time to think about other things to help develop society. After learning to farm the fields, people established forms of government and developed the first style cities that for instance, in the case of early civilizations such as Sumeria, were important city-states such as Lagash, Kish, and Uruk.

You might be interested in
Who was the 23rd president
docker41 [41]

Benjamin Harrison was the 23rd president for the U.S.A

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Religious toleration in the colonies was narrowly focused on Christianity.<br> True Or False?
babymother [125]
This is true. Not that they were intolerant to Muslims or Jews but rather there were not that many immigrants who were not Christians in the early period of colonization. Christianity was tolerated and while Puritans did not tolerate differences, there were colonies for Protestants and Catholics as well.
5 0
3 years ago
The Pilgrims were _____________.
Semenov [28]

Answer:

First off I would like to say how that is a very vague question so I cannot give you a straight answer. Is there more information? If not here are some answers you could try I guess...

The Pilgrims were a group of english men

The Pilgrims were english settelers

The Pilgrims were wanting to religous freedom so they left their homecountry on the Mayflower and settled in America

The Pilgrims were a group of people who wanted religious freedom and were  determeined to get it  

The Pilgrims were Separatists

8 0
3 years ago
Where did the Visigoths in Vandals come from???
KatRina [158]

Answer: People // Scientists don't exactly know, but that are leaning towards that they are from Scandinavia.

<em>I hope this helps, and Happy Holidays! :)</em>

7 0
3 years ago
What was the most significant factor that prevented many African states from achieving political stability in the decades after
ANEK [815]

Answer:

Africa will remain turbulent because it is poor and young, but also because it is growing and dynamic. Development is disruptive but also presents huge opportunities. The continent needs to plan accordingly.

Levels of armed conflict in Africa rise and fall. Data from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, the Global Terrorism Database and others indicate that armed conflict peaked in 1990/91 at the end of the Cold War, declined to 2005/6, remained relative stable to 2010/11 and then increased to 2015, although it peaked at lower levels than in 1990/91 before its most recent decline.

Armed conflict has changed. Today there are many more non-state actors involved in armed conflict in Africa – representing a greater fracturing of armed groupings. So it’s not a matter of “government vs an armed group” but a “government vs many armed groups”. Insurgents are often divided and sometimes even fighting amongst themselves. This greater fragmentation complicates peacemaking.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • William Penn referred to his colony as a “Holy Experiment” because
    15·2 answers
  • Definition of entangling alliances
    6·1 answer
  • How did the death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand instigate (urge on) the collapse of peace in
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Japan invade main church in 1931
    11·1 answer
  • When you provide information through writing that is:
    12·2 answers
  • Name three countries that used Marxist economic ideas during the twentieth century
    15·1 answer
  • Pleaee i really need this answer ​
    12·1 answer
  • What is an anecdote that could be included in an argumentative essay on Louisiana’s economy?
    6·2 answers
  • In which part of the state is the plateau region located? A. The North B. The South C. The West D. The East
    11·1 answer
  • Ano ang diskriminasyon​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!