1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lesechka [4]
3 years ago
14

What is one possible reason the Supreme Court's interpretation of equal protection has changed over time?

History
2 answers:
yulyashka [42]3 years ago
4 0

One possible reason why Supreme Court's interpretation of equal protection has changed over time? is:  D.The Supreme Court itself is more diverse

In the past, the justices in the supreme court were made up with only people from the same race, gender, and ethnicity. As we move forward, we start to acquire justices from different genders and racial background that offered different perspective on how to interpret equal protection.

Bezzdna [24]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is the last one
You might be interested in
Prompt
mr_godi [17]

Answer:promt

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What city is found at 18 south latitude and 69 W. longitude
creativ13 [48]

The city which is found at 18 south latitudes and 69 West Longitudes is called Curahuara De Carangas Municipality, Sajama Province, Bolivia.

<h3>What are Latitudes and Longitudes?</h3>

These are the earth's coordinate systems. They represent the angular distance of any location from the center of the earth and may be used to determine any point on the earths surface.

  • Latitude is the measurement of the distance from the north or south of the equator. It is often depicted by a vertical (imaginary) line graphically.
  • Longitude is the measurement of the distance from the east to the west.

Learn more about Longitudes and Latitudes in the link below:

brainly.com/question/1939015

3 0
2 years ago
Why did the Preaching for Politics happen?
lord [1]

ON NOVEMBER 13, 2016, THE Sunday after the election of Donald Trump, I stepped into the pulpit of St. Barnabas Memorial Church in Falmouth, Massachusetts, to preach. I do this two or three times a month, but it’s fair to say I approached my homiletical responsibility differently that Sunday. The months since November 2016 have buffeted us with report after report of scandal, violence, injustice, and deceit, so it may be worth remembering just what those five days between Tuesday, November 8, and Sunday, November 13, looked and felt like in the United States. At DeWitt Junior High, in my home state of Michigan, white students formed a wall outside the school and barred entry to any student of color. The white students said they were making America great again. A toy doll with brown skin had string tied around its neck and was hanged inside an elevator at Canisius College in Buffalo, New York. At Wellesley College in Massachusetts, students of color were spat upon while entering and exiting the multicultural student center. At San Diego State, a Muslim student was assaulted and her hijab torn from her head. There are many other examples.


These things saddened and frightened me, and as I climbed to the pulpit, I knew I must address them. The question, of course, was not if I should preach about politics, but how, and that question persists months later. Since early 2016 we have been told over and again by pundits and historians alike that our (continuing, unending) political moment is one of absolute singularity, one entirely without precedent. No one has ever campaigned like this, governed like this, spoken like this, lied like this, boasted like this, tweeted like this. So how should one preach in response to all this? What should political preaching look like in the age of Donald Trump? That is one question. But I want to ask a different, related, and perhaps more important one. In the age of Donald Trump, I do not want to ask how one should preach about politics. I want to ask: what will the politics of preaching itself be?

4 0
3 years ago
Bagaimakah sejarawan dapat membuat tafsiran dalam sejarah dengan betul dan tepat?
arsen [322]

Answer:

menggunakan sumber bacaan yang banyak dan membuat kajian. selain itu, menanyakan veteran tentang benda yang kita nak kaki tu

8 0
2 years ago
¿ Cuál es la importancia de los Hermanos Flores Magón
NISA [10]

Answer:Ricardo Flores Magón (nacido el 16 de septiembre de 1873 en San Antonio Eloxochitlán, Oaxaca, México; fallecido el 21 de noviembre de 1922 en Leavenworth, Kansas, Estados Unidos), reformador y anarquista mexicano que fue un precursor intelectual de la Revolución Mexicana.

Flores Magón nació de padre indígena y madre mestiza. Se involucró en el activismo estudiantil mientras estudiaba derecho en la Ciudad de México. Fue encarcelado por primera vez en 1892 por liderar una pequeña manifestación contra la reelección del dictador mexicano Porfirio Díaz. Pronto se unió a un pequeño grupo de reformadores liberales, con quienes fundó la revista Regeneración en 1900. Flores Magón fue encarcelado dos veces por sus actividades radicales con el grupo, y el gobierno suprimió Regeneración en 1901. Tras su tercer arresto en 1903 por oponerse el gobierno de Díaz, Flores Magón y varios de los otros radicales huyeron a Estados Unidos. Después de sobrevivir a un intento de asesinato en Texas, Flores Magón se mudó con el resto del grupo a St. Louis, Missouri, donde establecieron formalmente el Partido Liberal Mexicano (Partido Liberal Mexicano; PLM) en 1905 y reanudaron la publicación de Regeneración. Flores Magón se convirtió en el líder más visible del PLM.

Aunque los funcionarios estadounidenses inicialmente vieron a Flores Magón como un problema mexicano, los agentes del gobierno de los EE. UU. Pronto compartieron un interés con los funcionarios mexicanos en procesarlo por sus escritos subversivos. Luego de campañas armadas del PLM y una crisis económica en 1907, el gobierno mexicano contrató al detective privado Thomas Furlong para capturar a Flores Magón con la esperanza de extraditarlo a México. Aunque Furlong pronto lo atrapó en Los Ángeles, el gobierno mexicano no pudo asegurar su extradición. En cambio, fue juzgado y condenado en Arizona por conspiración para violar las leyes de neutralidad y fue sentenciado a 18 meses de prisión.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Urban slavery was well-developed in Spanish America and
    9·2 answers
  • The word Bantu refers to a common
    8·2 answers
  • Based on the passage, which of the statements concerning the trading
    12·1 answer
  • The President can veto any laws that Congress makes, but Congress can override the veto with a 2/3 vote or the judicial branch c
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the areas studied as a part of environmental sociology?
    6·2 answers
  • What did Sam Houston threaten to do if the U.S.
    14·1 answer
  • The photograph above shows a staff member of the Embassy in Tehran in November 1979
    11·1 answer
  • Urbanization
    7·1 answer
  • What is the reason for strengthening the bell trade act?
    12·1 answer
  • Which sentence uses humor in this excerpt?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!