Answer:
situational restraints
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this scenario is illustrating situational restraints. These are factors that act as barriers preventing certain behaviors or performances. Which is the case since the company wants and needs a training program but they do not have the personnel or the money to hire professional IT trainers. Therefore placing a barrier on the knowledge and skills that are needed from the training program.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
-1 to +1
Explanation:
The correlation coefficient range is from -1 to +1.
-1 shows that there is perfect negative correlation.
+1 shows that there is perfect positive correlation.
0 shows there is no correlation.
Positive correlation shows that with the increase of let's say X, there would also be increase of Y. They would positively move together
Negative correlation shows that two variable move in opposite direction.
Sherif’s (1966) classic Robbers Cave study of boys at summer camp finds the relationship between the two groups of boys immediately deteriorated when the event began.
In the 1940s and 1950s, social psychologist Muzafer Sherif and his associates conducted a number of investigations, including the Robbers Cave experiment. Sherif investigated the interactions between male groups at summer camps and a competitor group with the hypothesis that "when two groups have competing purposes... their members would become antagonistic to one other even when the groups are constituted of normal well-adjusted individuals at a summer camp " The Robbers Cave study found the incident swiftly escalated once the parties started throwing jabs. The Sherif discovered that the summer camps' surveys, in which they were asked to score their own team and the opposing team on good and bad attributes, contained questions about group animosity.
Learn more about Sherif here:
brainly.com/question/14407858
#SPJ9
Answer:
b. Only Emerald Corporation's current ratio will be increased.
Explanation:
Given that
Emerald current ratio is
= 0.5 i.e. = 0.5 ÷ 1
now in case when the current liability is doubles , so the current assets is
= 0.5 + 1 = 1.5
And, the cuurrent liabilities is
= 1 + 1
= 2
so new ratio is
= 1.5 ÷ 2
= 0.75
Now
Ruby current ratio is
= 1.5
i.e. = 1.5 ÷ 1
Now in case when the current liability is doubled,
the current assets is
= 1.5 + 1
= 2.5
And, current liabilities is
= 1 + 1
= 2
Now new ratio is
= 2.5 ÷ 2
= 1.25
Therefore the emerald current ratio is rised from 0.5 to 0.75
And, the Ruby's ratio has decline from 1.5 to 1.25
