A human life is so valuable that no single price should be placed on it. The effect on this stance on bioethical issues however, is relative.
<h3>Relativity of Human value to Bioethical issues</h3>
- A person's stance on a bioethical issue can be based on which human life they value more, the person that will gain, or the one that will be affected.
- With abortion, one might argue that the value of the mother is higher than the baby's because not having to take care of a child will give her a better life.
- Designer babies might be more valuable because their lower rate of birth defects mean that they are tougher and less expensive to maintain.
- Stem cell research could save many lives so more value might be placed on these lives than the embryos affected.
In conclusion, a person can see another life as valuable yet have relative views on bioethical issues.
Find out more on stem cell research at brainly.com/question/5409171.
They reproduce by pollination.
It's converted to ammonia.
Explanation:
Well, its extremely hot in the hydrothermal vents. Scientists simply believed it would be impossible for anything to survive due to the heat. Bacteria and micro-organisms were able to adapt to growing there, though. So in short words, they survived extreme conditions teaching scientists that life was quite adaptable.
Weird fun fact: In Switzerland it is illegal to own just one guinea pig. Felt the need to mention that ^ Sorry, I know it has nothing to do with the question but i felt it was worth speaking of.
The most Senistive part of the chest
