1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
____ [38]
3 years ago
8

President Franklin Roosevelt MOST LIKELY supported Lawrence Camp in the Senate race against Walter George and Eugene Talmadge in

1938 because he
History
2 answers:
kumpel [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

NNADVOKAT [17]3 years ago
3 0
<span>because he (Walter George) had influence in Congress. Senator Walter George's opposition to his policies (New Deal ideas) could hit the rock since he's influential in Congress. George had supported several of the earlier New Deal policies but he opposed Franklin Roosevelt's nomination for president in 1932. He was, however, opposed to several of Roosevelt's policy in his second term including rigorous regulation of utility companies, the Wealth Tax Acts—primarily on government reorganization and a wages and hours bill. So he had to convince the U.S. district attorney in Atlanta—Lawrence Camp—to run against George, hoping to use his presidential influence and his popularity in Georgia to help Camp win.</span>
You might be interested in
The nazi party had became largest party by?​
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

The Nazi party became the largest party by organized the Bamberg Conference. Hitler wanted to reunify the party, and set out a plan for the next few years. Whilst some small differences remained, Hitler was largely successful in reuniting the socialist and nationalist sides of the party.

In the same year, Hitler restructured the Nazi Party to make it more efficient.

Firstly, the Nazi Party adopted a new framework, which divided Germany into regions called Gaue. Each Gaue had its own leader, a Gauleiter. Each Gaue was then divided into subsections, called Kreise. Each Kreise then had its own leader, called a Kreisleiter. Each Kreise was then divided into even smaller sections, each with its own leader, and so on. Each of these sections were responsible to the section above them, with Hitler at the very top of the party with ultimate authority.

The Nazis also established new groups for different professions, from children, to doctors, to lawyers. These aimed to infiltrate already existing social structures, and help the party gain more members and supporters.

These political changes changed the Nazi Party from a paramilitary organization focused on overthrowing the republic by force, to one focused on gaining power through elections and popular support.

Explanation:

Long story short the Nazi party got to power so quickly by many reasons. Hitler had a lot of supporters, ended up brainwashing people basically, and not only were grown adults part of the Nazi Party, Hitler created something called "Nazi Youth" which was basically the teaching and brainwashing of young kids/teenagers on how to fight.

7 0
3 years ago
Can I get some help (30 points)
Tatiana [17]
#1 would be C.
#2 would be B.

Good luck :D

The DLFF
8 0
4 years ago
How did the Industrial Revolution affect the North?
Elden [556K]

Answer:

It resulted in taller buildings, changing the look of big cities.

Explanation:

i took the quiz

6 0
3 years ago
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry?
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

Historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry because they give a true picture of the political environment in that particular time period. ... Such cartoons are drawn by knowledgeable people who understand the public mindset very well.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which best describes the stance of most Northern states on protective tariffs in the years leading up to the civil war?
    6·2 answers
  • One long-term effect of the Crusades was the
    5·1 answer
  • What do the articles of the Constitution explicitly outline?
    8·2 answers
  • Which country did the u.s. fight during the spanish-america war
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the first labor reforms deal with children
    10·1 answer
  • Which statements are beliefs of communism? Check all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Help! Describe the difference between direct rule and indirect rule as it was practiced by imperial powers
    13·1 answer
  • Why do we refer to our Constitution as a "living document?"
    10·1 answer
  • 3. What does Willam's seizure of the English throne show about the transfer of royal power in the
    13·1 answer
  • What was the impact of new farm equipment on urban Americans?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!