There are definitely pros and cons to all of them
local leaders are closer to the people, but might not make a curriculum strong enough for students to succeed in other areas
states are a better option, but still would have different things taught than other states
the federal government would make a curriculum thats used nationwide, so everybody is educated on the same topic, but depending on what political party is in the gov, education could be skewed to make kids believe party beliefs.
personally I think either the states or the federal gov is the best choice to make decisions about what students learn and how they’re tested
Answer:
The correct option is A
Explanation:
Political parties organize themselves to forge a single frontier in order to win elections as well as cooperate with the government.
The sole aim of political party is to win elections and occupy government positions,but experience has shown that not winning an election can make a political party redundant and irrelevant, hence as soon as they loose out in elections, they organize themselves as opposition party in order to cooperate with the government of the day or criticize the positions of the government on key political and economic issues.
As a result of voicing their opinions, the electorates may see them as worthy of their votes next election
<span>They will both attend without bringing their own dessert. Social loafing is when a person does not work as hard as they are able to or exert a lot of effort due to the fact that they are working in a group.</span>
