All categories

2 years ago

Since the mid-1980s, the __________ has generated the least amount of increases in employment in the United States.

1 answer:

6 0

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "d. goods producing sector." Since the mid-1980s, the d. goods producing sector has generated the least amount of increases in employment in the United States.

You might be interested in

A company estimates that the appropriate discount rate (i.e., the cost of capital) for Project A, Project B, Project C and Proje

aliina [53]

Answer:

a. Project A requires an up-front expenditure of $1,000,000 and generates a net present value of $3,200.

Explanation:

The company should accept project A because it provides a positive net present value of $3,200 that is the highest among all the projects.

When the IRR of a project is lower than the required rate of return of the project, it will generate the negative net present value because at IRR the net present value of the project will be zero and at a higher rate than IRR it will be negative.

The project with a profitability index of less than 1 generates a negative NPV because the present value of future cash flows is less than the initial cash outflow.

Project D also generates a positive net present value but it is lower than project A. So, after comparing the results we will choose the project with higher NPV.

4 0

3 years ago

The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they Gro

-BARSIC- [3]

Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.

The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.

<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>

The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.

From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.

<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>

Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
"Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Learn more about antitrust laws here:

brainly.com/question/8431756

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago

With a regressive tax system, as the level of income increases in an economy, the average tax rate will:  A. Increase B. Decreas

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question is option B) decrease.

Explanation:

Regressive tax is that of tax which is imposed in such manner that when the income level in the economy increases , the average tax rate would decrease. This type of tax has heavy burden on the low income people as it takes high proportion of their income. So it can be said here that there is an inverse relationship between tax payer's ability to pay ( which can be measured in income , assets or consumption) and the tax rates imposed.

6 0

3 years ago

German and Japanese firms are viewed as having a _____ advantage in exporting compared to U.S. firms.

e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

bigger is the correct answer.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is <u>$16,000</u>, and your total cost of a year of college is <u>$48,000</u> per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually <u>more </u>than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college <u>gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.</u>

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0

3 years ago