Question

Which of the following BEST illustrates the process of the Supreme Court’s review of a case? A. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written B. lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> a writ of certiorari is granted >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written C. opinions are written >> a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote D. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> opinions are written >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote

Answer 1

Its A. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written .
Bro Dune Buggy

Answer 2

Answer:

From the options given, the one that best illustrates the process of the Supreme Court's review of a case is A: a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written.

Explanation:

When reopening a case for a revision, the first step is to ask for it, when the revision is allowed, the lawyers that represent each group prepare their arguments for asking for this review and they present them in a formal paper and orally. Then, the judges get together and discuss the arguments given and make a decision (by vote), this decision is then communicated in an official paper. This is the process justice take in this cases and, if we think about it, is the logical one, because after hearing the new arguments about something, they can discuss them and decide whether it is worthy or not to change the firs decision.